Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Force shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Force offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Force at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Force? Wrong! If the Force is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Force then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Force? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Force and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Force wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Force then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Force site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Force, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Force, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

In physics, force is an action or agency that causes a body of mass m to acceleration. It may be experienced as a lift, a push, or a pull. The acceleration of the body is proportional to the vector sum of all forces acting on it (known as net force or resultant force). In an extended body, force may also cause rotate, deformation, or an increase in pressure for the body. Rotational effects are determined by the torques, while deformation and pressure are determined by the Stress (physics)es that the forces create.

Net force is mathematically equal to the rate of change of the momentum of the body on which it acts. Since momentum is a vector (spatial) quantity (has both a magnitude and direction), force also is a vector quantity.

The concept of force has formed part of statics and dynamics (physics) since ancient times. Ancient contributions to statics culminated in the work of Archimedes in the 3rd century BC, which still forms part of modern physics. In contrast, Aristotle's dynamics incorporated intuitive misunderstandings of the role of force which were eventually corrected in the 17th century, culminating in the work of Isaac Newton. Following the development of quantum mechanics it is now understood that particles influence each another through fundamental interactions, making force a useful concept only on the macroscopic level. Only four fundamental interactions are known: strong force, electromagnetic force, weak force (unified into one electroweak interaction in 1970s), and gravitational force (in order of decreasing strength).

History Aristotle and his followers believed that it was the natural state of objects on Earth to be motionless and that they tended towards that state if left alone. He distinguished between the innate tendency of objects to find their "natural place" (e.g. for heavy bodies to fall), which lead to "natural motion", and unnatural or forced motion, which required continued application of a force. But this theory, although based on the everyday experience of how objects move (e.g. a horse and cart), had severe trouble accounting for projectiles, such as the flight of arrows. Several theories were discussed over the centuries, and the late medieval idea that objects in forced motion carried an innate force of the giant phallus impetus theory was influential on the work of Galileo. Galileo constructed an experiment in which stones and cannonballs were both rolled down an incline to disprove the Aristotelian theory of gravity early in the 17th century. He showed that the bodies were accelerated by gravity to an extent which was independent of their mass and argued that objects retain their velocity unless acted on by a force - usually friction.

Isaac Newton is recognised as argued explicitly for the first time that, in general, a constant force causes a constant rate of change (time derivative) of momentum. In essense, he gave the first (and the only) mathematical definition of the quantity force itself - as being the time-derivative of momentum: F = dp/dt.

In 1784 Charles Coulomb discovered the Coulomb's law of interaction between electric charges using a torsion balance, which was the second fundamental force. The weak and strong forces were discovered in the 20th century.

With the development of quantum field theory and general relativity it was realized that “force” is a redundant concept arising from conservation of momentum (4-momentum in relativity and momentum of virtual particles in QED). Thus currently known fundamental forces are more accurately called “fundamental interactions”.

Types of force Although there are apparently many types of forces in the Universe, they are all based on four fundamental forces. The strong and weak forces only act at very short distances and are responsible for holding certain nucleons and compound Atomic nucleus together. The electromagnetic force acts between electric charges and the gravitational force acts between masses. The Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the tendency of atoms not to overlap each other, and is thus responsible for the "stiffness" or "rigidness" of matter, but this also depends on the electromagnetic force which binds the constituents of every atom.

All other forces are based on these four. For example, friction is a manifestation of the electromagnetic force acting between the atoms of two surfaces, and the Pauli exclusion principle, which does not allow atoms to pass through each other. The forces in spring (device)s modeled by Hooke's law are also the result of electromagnetic forces and the exclusion principle acting together to return the object to its equilibrium position. Centrifugal forces are acceleration forces which arise simply from the acceleration of rotating reference frame.

There is currently some debate to whether there are five forces not four, due to the discovery of dark energy, which could be just an energy of vacuum fluctuations, or it could be a new type of energy resulting in a repulsive force.

The modern quantum mechanical view of the first three fundamental forces (all except gravity) is that particles of matter (fermions) do not directly interact with each other but rather by exchange of virtual particles (bosons). This exchange results in what we call electromagnetic interaction (Coulomb force is one example of electromagnetic interaction).

In general relativity, gravitation is not viewed as a force. Rather, objects moving freely in gravitational fields simply undergo inertial motion along a geodesic in the curved space-time - defined as the shortest space-time path between two space-time points. This straight line in space-time is seen as a curved line in space, and it is called the external ballistics trajectory of the object. For example, a basketball thrown from the ground moves in a parabola shape as it is in a uniform gravitational field. Its space-time trajectory (when the extra ct dimension is added) is almost a straight line, slightly curved (with the radius of curvature of the order of few light-years). The time derivative of the changing momentum of the body is what we label as "gravitational force".

Examples

Quantitative definition We have an intuitive grasp of the notion of force, since forces can be directly perceived as a push or pull. As with other physical concepts (e.g. temperature), the intuitive notion is quantified using operational definitions that are consistent with direct perception, but more precise. Historically, forces were first quantitatively investigated in conditions of static equilibrium where several forces cancelled each other out. Such experiments prove the crucial properties that forces are additive vector (spatial) quantities: they have magnitude (mathematics) and Direction (geometry, geography). So, when two forces act on an object, the resulting force, the resultant, is the vector addition of the original forces. This is called the principle of superposition. The magnitude of the resultant varies from the difference of the magnitudes of the two forces to their sum, depending on the angle between their lines of action. As with all vector addition this results in a parallelogram rule: the addition of two vectors represented by sides of a parallelogram, gives an equivalent resultant vector which is equal in magnitude and direction to the transversal of the parallelogram.

As well as being added, forces can also be broken down (or 'resolved'). For example, a horizontal force pointing northeast can be split into two forces, one pointing north, and one pointing east. Summing these component forces using vector addition yields the original force. Force vectors can also be three-dimensional, with the third (vertical) component at right-angles to the two horizontal components.

The simplest case of static equilibrium is when two forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. This remains the most usual way of measuring forces, using simple devices such as weighing scales and spring balances. Using such tools, several quantitative force laws were discovered: that the force of gravity is proportional to volume for objects made of a given material (widely exploited for millennia to define standard weights); Archimedes' principle for buoyancy; Archimedes' analysis of the lever; Boyle's law for gas pressure; and Hooke's law for springs: all these were all formulated and experimentally verified before Isaac Newton expounded his three laws of motion.

Force is sometimes defined using Newton's second law, as the product of mass m times acceleration \vec{a}:

\vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{p-->{dt} = \frac{d(m \vec{v})}{dt}=m\vec{a}

(or, more generally, as the rate of change of momentum). This approach is disparaged by the large majority of textbooks.e.g. Sect 12.1; Sect 2.1; Sect 4.3. By making this a definition of force, all empirical content is removed from the law. In fact, the \vec{F} in this equation represents the net (vector sum) force; in static equilibrium this is zero by definition, but (balanced) forces are present nevertheless. Instead, Newton's law is meaningful because it asserts the proportionality of two quantities which can be defined without reference to it. Thus, the intuitive Aristotelian belief that a net force is required to keep an object moving with constant velocity (therefore zero acceleration) is objectively wrong and not just a consequence of a poor choice definition. With rather more justification, Newton's second law can be taken as a quantitative definition of mass; certainly, by writing the law as an equality, the relative units of force and mass are fixed.

Given the empirical success of Newton's law, it is sometimes used to measure the strength of forces (for instance, using astronomical orbits to determine gravitational forces). Nevertheless, the force and the (mass times acceleration) used to measure it remain distinct concepts.

The definition of force is sometimes regarded as problematic, since it must either ultimately be referred to our intuitive understanding of our direct perceptions, or be defined implicitly through a set of self-consistent mathematical formulae. Notable physicists, philosophers and mathematicians who have sought a more explicit definition include Ernst Mach, Clifford Truesdell and Walter Noll.e.g. W. Noll, “On the Concept of Force”, in part B of Walter Noll's website..

Force in special relativity In the special theory of relativity mass and energy are equivalent (as can be seen by calculating the work required to accelerate a body). When an object's velocity increases so does its energy and hence its mass equivalent (inertia). It thus requires a greater force to accelerate it the same amount than it did at a lower velocity. The definition \vec{F} = \mathrm{d}\vec{p}/\mathrm{d}t remains valid. But in order to be conserved, momentum must be redefined as:

\vec{p} = \frac{m\vec{v-->{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2-->

where

v is the velocity and

c is the speed of light.

The relativistic expression relating force and acceleration for a particle with non-zero rest mass m\, moving in the x\, direction is:

F_x = \gamma^3 m a_x \,

F_y = \gamma m a_y \,

F_z = \gamma m a_z \,

where the Lorentz factor

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2-->

Here a constant force does not produce a constant acceleration, but an ever decreasing acceleration as the object approaches the speed of light. Note that \gamma is Division by zero for an object with a non zero Invariant mass at the speed of light, and the theory yields no prediction at that speed.

One can however restore the form of

F^\mu = mA^\mu \,

for use in relativity through the use of four-vectors. This relation is correct in relativity when F^\mu is the four-force, m is the invariant mass, and A^\mu is the four-acceleration.

Force and potential Instead of a force, the mathematically equivalent concept of a potential energy field can be used for convenience. For instance, the gravitational force acting upon a body can be seen as the action of the gravitational field that is present at the body's location. Restating mathematically the definition of energy (via definition of Mechanical work), a potential scalar field U(\vec{r}) is defined as that field whose gradient is equal and opposite to the force produced at every point:

\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U

Forces can be classified as Conservative force or nonconservative. Conservative forces are equivalent to the gradient of a potential.

Conservative forces A conservative force that acts on a closed system has an associated mechanical work that allows energy to convert only between kinetic energy or potential energy forms. This means that for a closed system, the net mechanical energy is conserved whenever a conservative force acts on the system. The force, therefore, is related directly to the difference in potential energy between two different locations in space and can be considered to be an artifact of the potential field in the same way that the direction and amount of a flow of water can be considered to be an artifact of the contour map of the elevation of an area.

Conservative forces include gravity, the Electromagnetism force, and the Hooke's law force. Each of these forces, therefore, have models which are dependent on a position often given as a radius \vec{r} eminating from spherical symmetry potentials. Examples of this follow:

For gravity:

\vec{F} = - \frac{G m_1 m_2 \vec{r-->{r^3}

where G is the gravitational constant, m_n is the mass of object n.

For electrostatic forces:

\vec{F} = - \frac{q_{1} q_{2} \vec{r-->{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3}

where \epsilon_{0} is Permittivity, q_n is the electric charge of object n.

For spring forces:

\vec{F} = - k \vec{r}

where k is the spring constant.

Nonconservative forces For certain physical scenarios, it is impossible to model forces as being due to gradient of potentials. This is often due to macrophysical considerations which yield forces as arising from a macroscopic statistical average of Microstate (statistical mechanics). For example, friction is caused by the gradients of numerous electrostatic potentials between the atoms, but manifests as a force model which is independent of any macroscale position vector. Nonconservative forces other than friction include other contact forces, Tension (physics), Physical compression, and drag (physics). However, for any sufficiently detailed description, all these forces are the results of conservative ones since each of these macroscopic forces are the net results of the gradients of microscopic potentials.

The connection between macroscopic non-conservative forces and microscopic conservative forces is described by detailed treatment with statistical mechanics. In macroscopic closed systems, nonconservative forces act to change the internal energy of the system and are often associated with the transfer of heat. According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, nonconservative forces necessarily result in energy transformations within closed systems from ordered to more random conditions as entropy increases.

Units of measurement The SI unit used to measure force is the newton (symbol N), which is equivalent to kg·m·s−2. The earlier CGS unit is the dyne. The relationship F=m·a can be used with either of these. In Imperial unit engineering units, if F is measured in "Pound-force" or "lbf", and a in feet per second squared, then m must be measured in slug (mass)s. Similarly, if mass is measured in pound-mass, and a in feet per second squared, the force must be measured in poundals. The units of slug (mass)s and poundals are specifically designed to avoid a constant of proportionality in this equation.

A more general form F=k·m·a is needed if consistent units are not used. Here, the constant k is a conversion factor dependent upon the units being used.

When the standard standard gravity (an acceleration of 9.80665 m/s²) is used to define pounds force, the mass in pounds is numerically equal to the weight in pounds force. However, even at sea level on Earth, the actual acceleration of free fall is quite variable, over 0.53% more at the poles than at the equator. Thus, a mass of 1.0000 lb at sea level at the equator exerts a force due to gravity of 0.9973 lbf, whereas a mass of 1.000 lb at sea level at the poles exerts a force due to gravity of 1.0026 lbf. The normal average sea level acceleration on Earth (World Gravity Formula 1980) is 9.79764 m/s², so on average at sea level on Earth, 1.0000 lb will exerts a force of 0.9991 lbf.

The equivalence 1 lb = 0.453 592 37 kg is always true, by definition, anywhere in the universe. If you use the standard standard gravity which is official for defining kilograms force to define pounds force as well, then the same relationship will hold between pounds-force and kilograms-force (an old non-SI unit is still used). If a different value is used to define pounds force, then the relationship to kilograms force will be slightly different—but in any case, that relationship is also a constant anywhere in the universe. What is not constant throughout the universe is the amount of force in terms of pounds-force (or any other force units) which 1 lb will exert due to gravity.

By analogy with the slug, there is a rarely used unit of mass called the "metric slug". This is the mass that accelerates at one metre per second squared when pushed by a force of one Kilogram-force. An item with a mass of 10 kg has a mass of 1.01972661 metric slugs (= 10 kg divided by 9.80665 kg per metric slug). This unit is also known by various other names such as the slug, TME (from a German acronym), and mug (from metric slug).

Another unit of force called the poundal (pdl) is defined as the force that accelerates 1 lbm at 1 foot per second squared. Given that 1 lbf = 32.174 lb times one foot per second squared, we have 1 lbf = 32.174 pdl.The kilogram-force is a unit of force that was used in various fields of science and technology. In 1901, the CGPM improved the definition of the kilogram-force, adopting a standard acceleration of gravity for the purpose, and making the kilogram-force equal to the force exerted by a mass of 1 kg when accelerated by 9.80665 m/s². The kilogram-force is not a part of the modern SI system, but is still used in applications such as:

In colloquial, non-scientific usage, the "kilograms" used for "weight" are almost always the proper SI units for this purpose. They are units of mass, not units of force.

The symbol "kgm" for kilograms is also sometimes encountered. This might occasionally be an attempt to distinguish kilograms as units of mass from the "kgf" symbol for the units of force. It might also be used as a symbol for those obsolete torque units (kilogram-force metres) mentioned above, used without properly separating the units for kilogram and metre with either a space or a centered dot.

Conversions Below are several conversion factors between various measurements of force:

See also {||-valign=top| | width=40 || | width=40 || |}

References

| last = Parker | first = Sybil | title = Encyclopedia of Physics, p 443, | location = Ohio | publisher = McGraw-Hill | year = 1993 | id = ISBN 0-07-051400-3 --> | last = Corbell | first = H.C. | coauthors = Philip Stehle | title = Classical Mechanics p 28, | location = New York | publisher = Dover publications | year = 1994 | id = ISBN 0-486-68063-0 --> | last = Halliday | first = David | coauthors = Robert Resnick; Kenneth S. Krane | title = Physics v. 1 | location = New York | publisher = John Wiley & Sons | year = 2001 | id = ISBN 0-471-32057-9 --> | last = Serway | first = Raymond A. | title = Physics for Scientists and Engineers | location = Philadelphia | publisher = Saunders College Publishing | year = 2003 | id = ISBN 0-534-40842-7 --> | last = Tipler | first = Paul | title = Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Mechanics, Oscillations and Waves, Thermodynamics | edition = 5th ed. | publisher = W. H. Freeman | year = 2004 | id = ISBN 0-7167-0809-4 --> | last = Verma | first = H.C. | title = Concepts of Physics Vol 1. | edition = 2004 Reprint | publisher = Bharti Bhavan | year = 2004 | id = ISBN 81-7709-187-5 -->

In physics, force is an action or agency that causes a body of mass m to acceleration. It may be experienced as a lift, a push, or a pull. The acceleration of the body is proportional to the vector sum of all forces acting on it (known as net force or resultant force). In an extended body, force may also cause rotate, deformation, or an increase in pressure for the body. Rotational effects are determined by the torques, while deformation and pressure are determined by the Stress (physics)es that the forces create.

Net force is mathematically equal to the rate of change of the momentum of the body on which it acts. Since momentum is a vector (spatial) quantity (has both a magnitude and direction), force also is a vector quantity.

The concept of force has formed part of statics and dynamics (physics) since ancient times. Ancient contributions to statics culminated in the work of Archimedes in the 3rd century BC, which still forms part of modern physics. In contrast, Aristotle's dynamics incorporated intuitive misunderstandings of the role of force which were eventually corrected in the 17th century, culminating in the work of Isaac Newton. Following the development of quantum mechanics it is now understood that particles influence each another through fundamental interactions, making force a useful concept only on the macroscopic level. Only four fundamental interactions are known: strong force, electromagnetic force, weak force (unified into one electroweak interaction in 1970s), and gravitational force (in order of decreasing strength).

History Aristotle and his followers believed that it was the natural state of objects on Earth to be motionless and that they tended towards that state if left alone. He distinguished between the innate tendency of objects to find their "natural place" (e.g. for heavy bodies to fall), which lead to "natural motion", and unnatural or forced motion, which required continued application of a force. But this theory, although based on the everyday experience of how objects move (e.g. a horse and cart), had severe trouble accounting for projectiles, such as the flight of arrows. Several theories were discussed over the centuries, and the late medieval idea that objects in forced motion carried an innate force of the giant phallus impetus theory was influential on the work of Galileo. Galileo constructed an experiment in which stones and cannonballs were both rolled down an incline to disprove the Aristotelian theory of gravity early in the 17th century. He showed that the bodies were accelerated by gravity to an extent which was independent of their mass and argued that objects retain their velocity unless acted on by a force - usually friction.

Isaac Newton is recognised as argued explicitly for the first time that, in general, a constant force causes a constant rate of change (time derivative) of momentum. In essense, he gave the first (and the only) mathematical definition of the quantity force itself - as being the time-derivative of momentum: F = dp/dt.

In 1784 Charles Coulomb discovered the Coulomb's law of interaction between electric charges using a torsion balance, which was the second fundamental force. The weak and strong forces were discovered in the 20th century.

With the development of quantum field theory and general relativity it was realized that “force” is a redundant concept arising from conservation of momentum (4-momentum in relativity and momentum of virtual particles in QED). Thus currently known fundamental forces are more accurately called “fundamental interactions”.

Types of force Although there are apparently many types of forces in the Universe, they are all based on four fundamental forces. The strong and weak forces only act at very short distances and are responsible for holding certain nucleons and compound Atomic nucleus together. The electromagnetic force acts between electric charges and the gravitational force acts between masses. The Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the tendency of atoms not to overlap each other, and is thus responsible for the "stiffness" or "rigidness" of matter, but this also depends on the electromagnetic force which binds the constituents of every atom.

All other forces are based on these four. For example, friction is a manifestation of the electromagnetic force acting between the atoms of two surfaces, and the Pauli exclusion principle, which does not allow atoms to pass through each other. The forces in spring (device)s modeled by Hooke's law are also the result of electromagnetic forces and the exclusion principle acting together to return the object to its equilibrium position. Centrifugal forces are acceleration forces which arise simply from the acceleration of rotating reference frame.

There is currently some debate to whether there are five forces not four, due to the discovery of dark energy, which could be just an energy of vacuum fluctuations, or it could be a new type of energy resulting in a repulsive force.

The modern quantum mechanical view of the first three fundamental forces (all except gravity) is that particles of matter (fermions) do not directly interact with each other but rather by exchange of virtual particles (bosons). This exchange results in what we call electromagnetic interaction (Coulomb force is one example of electromagnetic interaction).

In general relativity, gravitation is not viewed as a force. Rather, objects moving freely in gravitational fields simply undergo inertial motion along a geodesic in the curved space-time - defined as the shortest space-time path between two space-time points. This straight line in space-time is seen as a curved line in space, and it is called the external ballistics trajectory of the object. For example, a basketball thrown from the ground moves in a parabola shape as it is in a uniform gravitational field. Its space-time trajectory (when the extra ct dimension is added) is almost a straight line, slightly curved (with the radius of curvature of the order of few light-years). The time derivative of the changing momentum of the body is what we label as "gravitational force".

Examples

Quantitative definition We have an intuitive grasp of the notion of force, since forces can be directly perceived as a push or pull. As with other physical concepts (e.g. temperature), the intuitive notion is quantified using operational definitions that are consistent with direct perception, but more precise. Historically, forces were first quantitatively investigated in conditions of static equilibrium where several forces cancelled each other out. Such experiments prove the crucial properties that forces are additive vector (spatial) quantities: they have magnitude (mathematics) and Direction (geometry, geography). So, when two forces act on an object, the resulting force, the resultant, is the vector addition of the original forces. This is called the principle of superposition. The magnitude of the resultant varies from the difference of the magnitudes of the two forces to their sum, depending on the angle between their lines of action. As with all vector addition this results in a parallelogram rule: the addition of two vectors represented by sides of a parallelogram, gives an equivalent resultant vector which is equal in magnitude and direction to the transversal of the parallelogram.

As well as being added, forces can also be broken down (or 'resolved'). For example, a horizontal force pointing northeast can be split into two forces, one pointing north, and one pointing east. Summing these component forces using vector addition yields the original force. Force vectors can also be three-dimensional, with the third (vertical) component at right-angles to the two horizontal components.

The simplest case of static equilibrium is when two forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. This remains the most usual way of measuring forces, using simple devices such as weighing scales and spring balances. Using such tools, several quantitative force laws were discovered: that the force of gravity is proportional to volume for objects made of a given material (widely exploited for millennia to define standard weights); Archimedes' principle for buoyancy; Archimedes' analysis of the lever; Boyle's law for gas pressure; and Hooke's law for springs: all these were all formulated and experimentally verified before Isaac Newton expounded his three laws of motion.

Force is sometimes defined using Newton's second law, as the product of mass m times acceleration \vec{a}:

\vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{p-->{dt} = \frac{d(m \vec{v})}{dt}=m\vec{a}

(or, more generally, as the rate of change of momentum). This approach is disparaged by the large majority of textbooks.e.g. Sect 12.1; Sect 2.1; Sect 4.3. By making this a definition of force, all empirical content is removed from the law. In fact, the \vec{F} in this equation represents the net (vector sum) force; in static equilibrium this is zero by definition, but (balanced) forces are present nevertheless. Instead, Newton's law is meaningful because it asserts the proportionality of two quantities which can be defined without reference to it. Thus, the intuitive Aristotelian belief that a net force is required to keep an object moving with constant velocity (therefore zero acceleration) is objectively wrong and not just a consequence of a poor choice definition. With rather more justification, Newton's second law can be taken as a quantitative definition of mass; certainly, by writing the law as an equality, the relative units of force and mass are fixed.

Given the empirical success of Newton's law, it is sometimes used to measure the strength of forces (for instance, using astronomical orbits to determine gravitational forces). Nevertheless, the force and the (mass times acceleration) used to measure it remain distinct concepts.

The definition of force is sometimes regarded as problematic, since it must either ultimately be referred to our intuitive understanding of our direct perceptions, or be defined implicitly through a set of self-consistent mathematical formulae. Notable physicists, philosophers and mathematicians who have sought a more explicit definition include Ernst Mach, Clifford Truesdell and Walter Noll.e.g. W. Noll, “On the Concept of Force”, in part B of Walter Noll's website..

Force in special relativity In the special theory of relativity mass and energy are equivalent (as can be seen by calculating the work required to accelerate a body). When an object's velocity increases so does its energy and hence its mass equivalent (inertia). It thus requires a greater force to accelerate it the same amount than it did at a lower velocity. The definition \vec{F} = \mathrm{d}\vec{p}/\mathrm{d}t remains valid. But in order to be conserved, momentum must be redefined as:

\vec{p} = \frac{m\vec{v-->{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2-->

where

v is the velocity and

c is the speed of light.

The relativistic expression relating force and acceleration for a particle with non-zero rest mass m\, moving in the x\, direction is:

F_x = \gamma^3 m a_x \,

F_y = \gamma m a_y \,

F_z = \gamma m a_z \,

where the Lorentz factor

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2-->

Here a constant force does not produce a constant acceleration, but an ever decreasing acceleration as the object approaches the speed of light. Note that \gamma is Division by zero for an object with a non zero Invariant mass at the speed of light, and the theory yields no prediction at that speed.

One can however restore the form of

F^\mu = mA^\mu \,

for use in relativity through the use of four-vectors. This relation is correct in relativity when F^\mu is the four-force, m is the invariant mass, and A^\mu is the four-acceleration.

Force and potential Instead of a force, the mathematically equivalent concept of a potential energy field can be used for convenience. For instance, the gravitational force acting upon a body can be seen as the action of the gravitational field that is present at the body's location. Restating mathematically the definition of energy (via definition of Mechanical work), a potential scalar field U(\vec{r}) is defined as that field whose gradient is equal and opposite to the force produced at every point:

\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U

Forces can be classified as Conservative force or nonconservative. Conservative forces are equivalent to the gradient of a potential.

Conservative forces A conservative force that acts on a closed system has an associated mechanical work that allows energy to convert only between kinetic energy or potential energy forms. This means that for a closed system, the net mechanical energy is conserved whenever a conservative force acts on the system. The force, therefore, is related directly to the difference in potential energy between two different locations in space and can be considered to be an artifact of the potential field in the same way that the direction and amount of a flow of water can be considered to be an artifact of the contour map of the elevation of an area.

Conservative forces include gravity, the Electromagnetism force, and the Hooke's law force. Each of these forces, therefore, have models which are dependent on a position often given as a radius \vec{r} eminating from spherical symmetry potentials. Examples of this follow:

For gravity:

\vec{F} = - \frac{G m_1 m_2 \vec{r-->{r^3}

where G is the gravitational constant, m_n is the mass of object n.

For electrostatic forces:

\vec{F} = - \frac{q_{1} q_{2} \vec{r-->{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3}

where \epsilon_{0} is Permittivity, q_n is the electric charge of object n.

For spring forces:

\vec{F} = - k \vec{r}

where k is the spring constant.

Nonconservative forces For certain physical scenarios, it is impossible to model forces as being due to gradient of potentials. This is often due to macrophysical considerations which yield forces as arising from a macroscopic statistical average of Microstate (statistical mechanics). For example, friction is caused by the gradients of numerous electrostatic potentials between the atoms, but manifests as a force model which is independent of any macroscale position vector. Nonconservative forces other than friction include other contact forces, Tension (physics), Physical compression, and drag (physics). However, for any sufficiently detailed description, all these forces are the results of conservative ones since each of these macroscopic forces are the net results of the gradients of microscopic potentials.

The connection between macroscopic non-conservative forces and microscopic conservative forces is described by detailed treatment with statistical mechanics. In macroscopic closed systems, nonconservative forces act to change the internal energy of the system and are often associated with the transfer of heat. According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, nonconservative forces necessarily result in energy transformations within closed systems from ordered to more random conditions as entropy increases.

Units of measurement The SI unit used to measure force is the newton (symbol N), which is equivalent to kg·m·s−2. The earlier CGS unit is the dyne. The relationship F=m·a can be used with either of these. In Imperial unit engineering units, if F is measured in "Pound-force" or "lbf", and a in feet per second squared, then m must be measured in slug (mass)s. Similarly, if mass is measured in pound-mass, and a in feet per second squared, the force must be measured in poundals. The units of slug (mass)s and poundals are specifically designed to avoid a constant of proportionality in this equation.

A more general form F=k·m·a is needed if consistent units are not used. Here, the constant k is a conversion factor dependent upon the units being used.

When the standard standard gravity (an acceleration of 9.80665 m/s²) is used to define pounds force, the mass in pounds is numerically equal to the weight in pounds force. However, even at sea level on Earth, the actual acceleration of free fall is quite variable, over 0.53% more at the poles than at the equator. Thus, a mass of 1.0000 lb at sea level at the equator exerts a force due to gravity of 0.9973 lbf, whereas a mass of 1.000 lb at sea level at the poles exerts a force due to gravity of 1.0026 lbf. The normal average sea level acceleration on Earth (World Gravity Formula 1980) is 9.79764 m/s², so on average at sea level on Earth, 1.0000 lb will exerts a force of 0.9991 lbf.

The equivalence 1 lb = 0.453 592 37 kg is always true, by definition, anywhere in the universe. If you use the standard standard gravity which is official for defining kilograms force to define pounds force as well, then the same relationship will hold between pounds-force and kilograms-force (an old non-SI unit is still used). If a different value is used to define pounds force, then the relationship to kilograms force will be slightly different—but in any case, that relationship is also a constant anywhere in the universe. What is not constant throughout the universe is the amount of force in terms of pounds-force (or any other force units) which 1 lb will exert due to gravity.

By analogy with the slug, there is a rarely used unit of mass called the "metric slug". This is the mass that accelerates at one metre per second squared when pushed by a force of one Kilogram-force. An item with a mass of 10 kg has a mass of 1.01972661 metric slugs (= 10 kg divided by 9.80665 kg per metric slug). This unit is also known by various other names such as the slug, TME (from a German acronym), and mug (from metric slug).

Another unit of force called the poundal (pdl) is defined as the force that accelerates 1 lbm at 1 foot per second squared. Given that 1 lbf = 32.174 lb times one foot per second squared, we have 1 lbf = 32.174 pdl.The kilogram-force is a unit of force that was used in various fields of science and technology. In 1901, the CGPM improved the definition of the kilogram-force, adopting a standard acceleration of gravity for the purpose, and making the kilogram-force equal to the force exerted by a mass of 1 kg when accelerated by 9.80665 m/s². The kilogram-force is not a part of the modern SI system, but is still used in applications such as:

In colloquial, non-scientific usage, the "kilograms" used for "weight" are almost always the proper SI units for this purpose. They are units of mass, not units of force.

The symbol "kgm" for kilograms is also sometimes encountered. This might occasionally be an attempt to distinguish kilograms as units of mass from the "kgf" symbol for the units of force. It might also be used as a symbol for those obsolete torque units (kilogram-force metres) mentioned above, used without properly separating the units for kilogram and metre with either a space or a centered dot.

Conversions Below are several conversion factors between various measurements of force:

See also {||-valign=top| | width=40 || | width=40 || |}

References

| last = Parker | first = Sybil | title = Encyclopedia of Physics, p 443, | location = Ohio | publisher = McGraw-Hill | year = 1993 | id = ISBN 0-07-051400-3 --> | last = Corbell | first = H.C. | coauthors = Philip Stehle | title = Classical Mechanics p 28, | location = New York | publisher = Dover publications | year = 1994 | id = ISBN 0-486-68063-0 --> | last = Halliday | first = David | coauthors = Robert Resnick; Kenneth S. Krane | title = Physics v. 1 | location = New York | publisher = John Wiley & Sons | year = 2001 | id = ISBN 0-471-32057-9 --> | last = Serway | first = Raymond A. | title = Physics for Scientists and Engineers | location = Philadelphia | publisher = Saunders College Publishing | year = 2003 | id = ISBN 0-534-40842-7 --> | last = Tipler | first = Paul | title = Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Mechanics, Oscillations and Waves, Thermodynamics | edition = 5th ed. | publisher = W. H. Freeman | year = 2004 | id = ISBN 0-7167-0809-4 --> | last = Verma | first = H.C. | title = Concepts of Physics Vol 1. | edition = 2004 Reprint | publisher = Bharti Bhavan | year = 2004 | id = ISBN 81-7709-187-5 -->



The FORCES International Liberty News Network
The pro-choice on smoking organization.

Forces 1
In science, force, usually means either a push or a pull. Think of a game of ten pin bowling. The moving object - the ball, exerts a pushing force against ...

BBC - Schools Science Clips - Forces and movement
An interactive track on which children aged 6-7 can explore the effect of the slope of the track, the weights of the vehicles and the strengths of push.

BBC - Schools - KS2 Bitesize Revision - Science
An animated KS2 Bitesize activity for the Science topic: Forces in action ... Teachers: Copy and paste all the code below to put this activity on your blog or website.

Friends of the River Crane Environment
This website provides details of activities and projects run by FORCE as well as providing background information on our local area. Please feel free to get in touch with us ...

Force Cancer Charity
Force - Working in Devon to support anyone affected by cancer ... Last updated 04/07/2008) Century Cycle Challenge Pictures and On-Line Sonsorship

Force Engineerings Linear Induction Motors
Force Engineering was founded in 1979 to promote sales, development and use of environmentally friendly Linear Induction Motors (LIMs). Force has supplied and advised many ...

Force from FOLDOC
Force. A dBASE dialect for MS-DOS. Try this search on Wikipedia, OneLook, Google

Forces Reunited Discount Card
Forces Discount - Forces Discount and ID Card from Forces Reunited ... Forces Discount. Welcome to the Forces Reunited "Proud to be a Forces Veteran" Forces Discount Card.

The Royal Air Force
Official site of the junior military service including aircraft, stations, history, current news and links to associated websites.

 

Force



 
Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
commercial commons license from Yahoo!